Lane Startin for Congress

www.lanestartin.org

Nevada 1st District – 2002

“Progressive Spirit, Western Values”

 

Biography / Issues / News Releases / E-Mail List / CONTRIBUTE / Links / Diversions

 

ISSUES

 

Response to the American Legion/Citizens Flag Alliance on the “Flag Protection Constitutional Amendment”

8 November 2001

 

Background: the Citizens Flag Alliance supports the following proposed constitutional amendment: “The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.” This is in response to the 1989 Supreme Court decision Texas v. Johnson, which upheld flag burning as a form of free speech.

 

Original e-mail (.txt format)

Original questionnaire and responses (.doc format)

 

Question 1: Do you believe burning the American flag is speech as defined by the First Amendment?

Lane’s Answer:     YES

 

Question 2: Do you believe elected officials have an obligation to correct the mistakes of the court?

Lane’s Answer:     NO

 

Question 3: Do you believe the people should have the right to protect their flag if they so chose?

Lane’s Answer:    YES

 

Question 4: If elected to the 108th Congress, will you cosponsor the flag-protection amendment?

Lane’s Answer:     NO

 

Question 5: If elected to the 108th Congress, will you vote for the flag-protection amendment quoted above?

Lane’s Answer:    NO

 

Question 6:  Would you like the CFA to send you more information on the Flag- Protection Amendment?

Lane’s Answer:    NO

 

Additional comments:

 

Mark C. Seavey, Assistant Director

National Legislative Commission

The American Legion

1608 K Street NW

Washington, DC 20006-2847

 

8 November 2001

 

Dear Mr. Seavey:

 

Thank you for your recent e-mail requesting my views on the Flag Protection Constitutional Amendment. My responses to your questions are enclosed.

 

As an amateur vexillologist I am quite interested in the history, customs and appropriate usage of the United States flag and others around the world. I personally believe flag burning as a form of political speech, whether it be the national flag of the United States or someone else’s, is a stupid and wholly ineffective way to get one’s point across, quite often having the opposite effect than the one intended. There’s no doubt in my mind that the vast majority of Americans oppose such practices, and rightfully so.

 

However, I also firmly believe in America we have the right to be stupid and ineffective. Propaganda aside, a constitutional amendment prohibiting flag burning simply runs counter to the traditions of free speech – no matter how unpopular that speech may be – we have upheld for over 225 years. In addition, no civic purpose is served in implementing the purposely long, tough process of creating a constitutional amendment in order to single out a tiny minority of malcontents, which is essentially what is proposed here. Let the fringe speak for itself, as a truly strong democracy has nothing to fear from it.

 

As a member of Congress I would have a sworn duty to uphold the Constitution of the United States, which among other things means it’s not my place to go around persecuting people we don’t like even though they are, well, stupid and ineffective. Because of that, I cannot support your proposed constitutional amendment as written.

 

I notice your web site at www.cfa-inc.org details several flag burning instances that are obvious acts of vandalism against the property of others. These are instances where enforcing local statutes covering vandalism and property destruction are quite appropriate. This is why I answered yes to your question, “Do you believe the people should have the right to protect their flag if they so chose?” They do now, and there’s no reason for us to change that one way or the other, especially not at the federal level.

 

These comments, as well as your original questionnaire with my responses, will be posted to my campaign web site at www.lanestartin.org for the public’s information.

 

I hope your questions have been answered on this matter. If you would like any further information please don’t hesitate to contact me.

 

With best regards,

 

W. Lane Startin

2002 candidate for US House of Representatives, Nevada 1st District

Green Party

 

 

Authorized by the Lane Startin for Congress Committee, Amber J. Schneiter, Treasurer

PO Box 33761

Las Vegas, NV 89133-3761

(702) 658-2789

info@lanestartin.org

Last update: 8 November 2001